|
Service Management and Evaluation Sub-Committee
Of the
Local Business Planning Committee
December 2, 2002
MINUTES
MEMBERS
Bert Bleakley, NAMI
PRESENT:
Louis Gloston, Peterkin & Associates/IPA
Lena Klumper, Partnership for Children
Daniel Muldrow,
Main Focus
Alfred Spriggs,
L.I.F.E. Concepts
STAFF
Debbie Jenkins, Child and Family Services
PRESENT:
Director, CCMHC
Densie Lucas, Assistant Area Director, CCMHC
William H. McDougal,
Substance Abuse
Services Director, CCMHC
Stacy Martin, Clerk to
the Area Board,
CCMHC (Recorder)
I. Welcome/Introductions
Mrs. Jenkins thanked everyone for coming.
II.
Agenda Adjustments
Minutes from 11-25-02 were adopted.
III.
Continued Discussion of Service Management Section
·
Redistributed the Grid (ATTACHMENT A) as well as
pages 17-19 of the State Plan (ATTACHMENT B) and discussed the
elements with the following highlights:
- management of core services;
- ensuring the management plan is supported by the CFAC;
- oversight of delivery of services to the target
populations; and
- best practices.
·
Ms. Lucas discussed the availability of a 24/7
crisis team in collaboration with CONTACT, DSS, law enforcement,
BHC, Cape Fear Valley, Health Department, and housing
resources. The team would meet with clients at location other
than the emergency room as this is at an expensive of at least
$600.00 for the medical clearance in the Emergency Room.
- Discussed the possibility of utilizing space at Roxie
Avenue Center for this purpose.
·
Mrs. Jenkins re-distributed the following
documents to members who did not have:
- Values and Principles For the Mental Health Center’s
System of Care (ATTACHMENT C)
- Utilization Statistics of Dorothea Dix Hospital
(ATTACHMENT D).
·
Mr. Bleakley pointed out that when the new jail
opens, they are supposed to have mental health services
available. Currently there is the availability of a psychiatrist
one day per week (Mondays) and with a Public Health Department
Nurse assigned as staff to the jail. (The Health Department
expends a large amount of money on psychotropic medications for
the inmates).
·
There was discussion regarding MOA reflecting a
mental health assessment being conducted within one hour for
children. In some areas this is a requirement for all age
groups.
·
Item 2 if grid: have had several committees at
CCMHC addressing issues with the following recommendations:
- single access for adults and one for children’s services with the
most skilled staff performing the assessments. Mrs. Jenkins
commented that there are six events/occurrences available prior
to identifying a client as a member of a target population.
Following the process appropriately and completely is critical
as it determines payment/billing eligibility to Medicaid and the
State. All pilot programs, with the exception of VGFW are or
have experienced problems with this.
- need too look at authorizations. Mr. Gloston reported that IPA/Peterkin
currently track authorizations on paper.
·
Discussed points of entry into the system. It is
unknown at this time what the multiple points of entry will be.
VGFW uses every public agency along with the school system.
- Would be cleaner for Cumberland County to utilize public agencies
(schools, court, DSS, etc.) and use the crisis response team of
the LME for after hours.
- Access Subcommittee will begin meeting soon to address
this issue.
- Mrs. Jenkins reported that she hopes to have the geographic
mapping complete within two weeks to identify where access
points need to be based on current providers and consumers.
- Mrs. Jenkins shared what disability-specific assessments need to
be completed and informed members they are listed/discussed in
the Service Monitoring section of the State Plan.
·
Mrs. Jenkins reported that the LME will handle
item three of the grid.
- Discussed step-down services currently available and the need to
develop mid-range services such as respite.
- Ms. Lucas shared that there is a push in the Triangle area to not
close Dix Hospital as it will have a huge impact on care and the
economy of that area. There was discussion that sending clients
to Butner will significantly increase commute time and have a
significant impact on law enforcement as they are primary
transporters for clients to state hospitals.
·
In response to item four of the grid, there was
discussion regarding inadequate resources for crisis services.
- People are currently sitting in the emergency room for
hours.
- Mr. Spriggs shared with the committee that BHC is shutting down
some of its inpatient beds and that this will increase the
bottleneck in ER.
- It is the hoped that the crisis team will help bypass the lengthy
and exhaustive process of going through ER assessment.
- Mrs. Jenkins shared that CCMHC has been in discussion with Mr.
Sprouse of BHC about alternatives to accessing the ER.
- Mr. Spriggs shared an idea that he has for transitional housing.
The proposal will offer intensive case management supports for
5-6 people. He suggested that this could also serve as a triage
site. Ms. Lucas cautioned him about mixing crisis assessment
with step-down. Mr. McDougal offered the name of Mr. Bert
Bennett, Capacity Coordinator at the Division who could help
with grants. Mr. Spriggs has already talked with Mr. Bennett and
has also communicated with NIDA about funding opportunities.
- Ms. Lucas suggested that there is a need to look at
training/education regarding co-occurring issues across the
spectrum of MI/DD/SAS/HIV and health issues in general.
·
Regarding item #5, Mrs. Jenkins reported that she
is still waiting for the State to clarify their concept of one
case manager per family as there is some differences of opinion
on whether this is true in human services specific areas or if
it is across all human service agencies. She did share that
at-risk case management for DSS has been differentiated by the
State from clinical case management for mental health. Once
more clarification is received from the State, CCMHC will better
be able to determine direction for case management and care
coordination.
·
In response to item #6, Mrs. Jenkins commented
that the State is still debating a standardized contract. This
will be handled by the QPN subcommittee.
·
Regarding Item #7, a policy has been written in
the QPN committee stating that individuals will be given
choice. Fair competition for referrals will require additional
discussion to ensure fair distribution and equity.
·
With respect to item #8, Mrs. Jenkins shared
Medicaid appeals process regarding denials, suspensions,
terminations, or reductions in services as this will be the
similar appeals process for target populations.
IV.
Next Steps
Mrs. Jenkins will bring to next meeting written
documentation including Executive Summary that will be submitted
to State, narratives, and the Strategic Plan.
V. Adjournment
Next meeting will be in two weeks on Monday, 12/16/02 at
8:30 a.m.
|